SEC Fines Hedge Fund Advisor Over $8 Million For Failure To Prevent Insider Trading

Types Of SEC Cases:  Failure To Prevent Insider Trading

Hedge Fund Advisor And Employee Settle SEC Charges For Failure To Prevent Insider Trading

The SEC charged a hedge fund advisory firm and one of its Senior Research Analysts with failure to prevent insider trading. In its Administrative Order, the SEC alleged that Artis Capital Management (“Artis”) and Analyst Michael W. Harden (“Harden”) failed to properly respond to irregular trading activity by an employee and take appropriate action.
prevent insider trading

The SEC Order

The SEC further alleged that Artis and Harden were presented with red flags that should have alerted them to the wrongdoing and enabled them to prevent insider trading.

Senior Research Analyst Ignored Procedures To Prevent Insider Trading

The basis for the SEC’s charges revolved around the actions of an Artis research analyst, Matthew Teeple (“Teeple”).  Teeple was tasked with researching and providing trading recommendations on companies in the information technology sector, including Foundry Networks, Inc. (“Foundry”). According to the SEC, Teeple did not build analytical financial models that tracked the financial performance of the companies that he covered.  He did not provide written reports that supported his buy and sell recommendations.  Nor did he provide research files that were reviewable by his superiors or Artis. On at least two occasions, Teeple provided information about Foundry to Artis.  Artis relied on that information to execute profitable trades in advance of public announcements about Foundry.  In both instances, Teeple discussed his information with his supervisor, Harden. The SEC claimed that the information shared by Teeple should have caused a reasonable supervisor to question the appropriateness of Teeple’s information.  That should have led to a further inquiry to determine if the information was nonpublic information that had been provided by a Foundry insider. According to the SEC, such actions would have allowed Harden to prevent insider trading.  Not only did Harden not take these actions, but he failed to report the information to Artis’s Chief Compliance Officer or any other senior personnel who could have investigated the matter.

Insufficient Policies And Procedures To Prevent Insider Trading

In addition to Harden, the SEC charged Artis with failing to establish, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent insider trading through the misuse of material nonpublic information. Teeple’s regular contact with technology industry sources at public companies created substantial risk that material nonpublic information could be obtained and used.  Therefore, reasonable procedures were required to prevent the misuse of such information. Even though Artis had written policies and procedures in place that addressed these issues, according to the SEC, Artis failed to properly enforce those policies and procedures. In a press release, the Senior Associate Director of the SECʼs New York Regional Office stated:

Hedge fund advisory firms and supervisors must take all reasonable measures necessary to prevent insider trading, yet Artis Capital and Harden failed to take any action at all in response to Teepleʼs highly profitable and suspiciously-timed trading recommendations.

prevent inside trading

The SEC’s press release

Disgorgement And Penalties

Artis and Harden agreed to settle the charges with the SEC as follows:
  • $5,165,862 disgorgement of the illicit trading profits (Artis)
  • $2,582,931 penalty (Artis)
  • $1,129,222 interest (Artis)
  • $130,000 penalty (Harden)
The Co-Chief of the SEC Enforcement Divisionʼs Market Abuse Unit added in the press release:

By disgorging the illicit profits that Artis Capital obtained through Teepleʼ s misconduct, this settlement ensures that the firm and Harden will not be rewarded for their negligence.

Additionally, Harden was suspended from the securities industry for 12 months. Teeple and his source, David Riley, were charged by the SEC in a broader insider trading matter.  In addition, they were prosecuted by criminal authorities and given prison sentences for their actions.

Whistleblowers Can Report Insider Trading Violations To The SEC

This case illustrates some types of misconduct that could give rise to SEC whistleblower cases if reported to the Commission through the SEC whistleblower program. However, the SEC has not made any public statement as to whether this case was itself an actual SEC whistleblower case.  The SEC Office of the Whistleblower posts Notices of Covered Action (“NoCA”) for Commission actions where a final judgment or order results in monetary sanctions exceeding $1 million.  The NoCA list does not disclose if a particular Enforcement action was brought as the result of an SEC whistleblower case, tip, complaint, or referral being filed with the Commission.

Additional Information

For more information about the failure to prevent insider trading, click on the links below:
  • The SEC’s Order in SEC v. Artis and Harden.  (External link to the SEC’s website.)
  • The SEC’s Press Release about SEC v. Artis and Harden.  (External link to the SEC’s website.)

The above information is not and should not be construed as providing legal advice. It is not and should never be considered as a substitute for consulting with your own lawyer. The use of this web site or this page does not constitute or create any attorney-client, fiduciary, or confidential relationship between The Pickholz Law Offices LLC and/or the owners/operators of this web site, or anyone else. The information contained on this website is for informational purposes only. The content of this web site may not reflect current developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results of prior cases or matters contained on this web site are not indicative of future results or outcomes, and should not be taken as a prediction, promise, or guarantee of any future result or outcome. No one who accesses this web site should act or refrain from acting based on anything contained on this web site. For additional terms and conditions governing the use of this web site, please click on the “disclaimer” link at the bottom of this page or click here.